中国科学技术大学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 392-402.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2017.05.004

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于TIGGE数据的西太平洋副热带高压多模式集成预报及检验

颜妍,周任君,柯宗建,刘长征,杜良敏,苏琪骅   

  1. 1.中国科学技术大学地球与空间科学学院,安徽合肥 230026;
    2.中国气象局国家气候中心,北京 100081;3.武汉区域气候中心,湖北武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-21 修回日期:2017-04-12 出版日期:2017-05-31 发布日期:2017-05-31
  • 通讯作者: 周任君
  • 作者简介:颜妍,女,1992年生,硕士生. 研究方向:多模式集成预报. E-mail:yany519@outlook.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(91437105),公益性行业(气象)科研专项(GYHY201306024)资助.

Ensemble forecast and verification of the Western Pacific Subtropical High based on multi-model data from TIGGE

YAN Yan, ZHOU Renjun, KE Zongjian, LIU Changzheng, DU Liangmin, SU Qihua   

  1. 1. School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230016,China;
    2. National Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081,China;
    3. Wuhan Regional Climate Center, Wuhan 430074,China
  • Received:2017-02-21 Revised:2017-04-12 Online:2017-05-31 Published:2017-05-31

摘要: 基于TIGGE(THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble)资料中的中国气象局(CMA)、日本气象厅(JMA)、欧洲中期天气预报中心(ECMWF)、美国国家环境预报中心(NCEP)和英国气象局(UKMO)等5个中心的500 hPa位势高度场数据,评估了各中心对西太副高控制预报和集合预报的效果,并采用了多模式集成平均(EMN)、消除偏差集成平均(BREM)和滑动训练期超级集合(R_SUP)3种方法对各中心数据进行集成.评估方法包括Talagrand分布、相关系数、均方根误差、Brier技巧评分等.结果表明:各中心预报效果有明显差异,各模式对500 hPa位势高度场控制预报中,UKMO预报效果最好,而各模式对500 hPa位势高度场集合预报中,则是ECMWF预报效果最好.从均方根误差改进率来看,基于控制预报的BREM和R_SUP集成方法明

关键词: TIGGE, 西太副高, 多模式集成, 预报

Abstract: The skill of a set of control and ensemble forecasts of Western Pacific Subtropical High was evaluated based on the 500 hPa geopotential height information from the THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble (TIGGE) datasets, which consist of model outputs from CMA, JMA, ECMWF, UKMO and NCEP. Three methods were adopted, i.e., Ensemble Mean (EMN), Bias-Removed Ensemble Mean (BREM) and running Training Period Superensemble (R_SUP), to integrate the data from different sources, and the metrics for performance evaluation include Talagrand distribution, correlation coefficient, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Brier Skill Score (BSS). A comparison of the outputs of these models shows significant variation in forecast performance. The results indicate that the UKMO model has the best forecast skill for the 500 hPa geopotential height among all control forecasts, while the ECMWF model ranks on the top of all ensemble forecasts. From the improvement of RMSE, both BREM and R_SUP can significantly reduce the RMSE of the integrated forecast results compared to the original control forecasts in TIGGE, but EMN does not show similar improvement. However, none of the three integration methods shows discernable improvement of ensemble forecast of the 500 hPa geopotential height, with all having less skills than ECMWF single model ensemble forecast.

Key words: TIGGE, WPSH, multi-model ensemble, forecast

中图分类号: