经济新常态下相机抉择的财政政策效果研究——基于市场情绪波动性的视角

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2017.06.011

中国科学技术大学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 524-529.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2017.06.011

经济新常态下相机抉择的财政政策效果研究——基于市场情绪波动性的视角

杨曌凉，崔志坤

安徽财经大学财政与公共管理学院，安徽蚌埠 233000

收稿日期:2016-12-08 修回日期:2017-03-17 出版日期:2017-06-30 发布日期:2017-06-30
通讯作者: 崔志坤
作者简介:杨曌凉，女，1990年生，硕士.研究方向:税收理论与政策.E-mail:xiaodeyi2014123@163.com.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（61473001，71071045，71131002）；

The economic effect of discretionary fiscal policy research under the new normal based on the perspective of market sentiment volatility

YANG Zhaoliang, CUI ZhiKun

School of Finance and Public Management, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233000, China

Received:2016-12-08 Revised:2017-03-17 Online:2017-06-30 Published:2017-06-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选择城镇投资环比增长率、财政支出累计增长率、财政支出与广义货币供应量同比增长率比值这3个变量并收集到相关数据，建立GARCH、TGARCH模型，重点研究财政政策在实施的过程中市场情绪波动对投资行为产生的影响，从而进一步分析在经济新常态下财政政策的实施效果.结果显示，财政政策的实施对私人投资产生了挤出效应，但挤出的空间有限；财政政策与货币政策同时实施，产生协同作用，如果加大财政政策的实施力度，反而刺激了投资的增加.政策实施过程中，市场情绪对投资行为的波动影响是持久的，这种影响的效果随时间的推移逐渐减弱，对未来的预测有重要参考意义.当不利消息影响市场情绪时，财政政策的实施使这种负面因素对投资波动的冲击变小；经济步入新常态以后，由于经济发展速度的减缓，投资者的行为趋于谨慎.

关键词: 财政政策, 市场情绪, GARCH模型, 相机抉择

Abstract: Establishing the models of GARCH and TGARCH based on related data collected through three variables, the growth rate of urban investment, the cumulative growth rate of fiscal expenditure, and the year-on -year growth rate of fiscal expenditure and broad money supply, the impacts of market volatility on investment behavior in the process of implementing fiscal policies was studied, and the effect of the fiscal policies under the new economic normal was further analyzed. The results show that the implementation of fiscal policies has a crowding-out effect on private investment, but the resulting space is limited. Fiscal policies act synergistically with monetary policies for the enforcement of fiscal policies stimulates the increase of investment instead. In the process of policy implementation, the influence of market sentiment on investment behavior is lasting, which decreases gradually over time and has an important reference value for future projections. When the negative news affects market sentiment, the implementation of fiscal policies weakens the effect of negative factors on the investment fluctuations; as the economy steps into the new normal, investor behavior tends to be cautious due to the slow pace of economic development.

Key words: fiscal policy, market sentiment, GARCH model, discretionary

中图分类号:

F812

杨曌凉，崔志坤. 经济新常态下相机抉择的财政政策效果研究——基于市场情绪波动性的视角[J]. 中国科学技术大学学报, 2017, 47(6): 524-529.

YANG Zhaoliang, CUI ZhiKun. The economic effect of discretionary fiscal policy research under the new normal based on the perspective of market sentiment volatility[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology of China, 2017, 47(6): 524-529.

参考文献

［1］
UZEUA H. Optimum technical change in an aggregative model of economic growth[J]. International Economic Review, 1965, 6: 167-184.
[2] LUCAS R E. On the mechanics of economic development[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1988, 22(1):3-42.
[3] SRESENM P B. Human capital investment, government, and endogenous growth[J]. International Tax and Public Finance, 1993(1):55-79.
[4] ARROW K J, KURZ M. Public Investment, the Rate of Return, and Optimal Fiscal Policy[M]. Baltimore, MD: John Hoping University Press, 1970.
[5] SOLOW R M, TOBIN J, VON WEIZSCKER C C, et al. Neoclassical growth with fixed factor proportions[J]. Readings in the Theory of Growth, 1971(2): 68-102.
[6] FISHER W H, TURNOVSKY S J. Public investment, congestion, and private capital accumulation[J]. The Economic Journal, 1998, 108: 399-413.
[7] CZARNITZKI D, HUSSINGER K. The link between R＆D subsidies, R＆D spending and technological performance[R]. Mannheim, Germany: Center for European Economic Research, 2004: ZEW Discussion Paper No. 04-56．
[8] KORTUM S, LERNER J. Does venture capital spur innovation?[R]. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1988: NBER Working Paper No.6846.
[9] 杨林，马顺.促进战略新兴产业发展的财政政策研究[J].山东社会科学，2012（2）：146-149.
[10] DRUCKER J, FESER E. Regional industrial structure and agglomeration economies: An analysis of productivity in three manufacturing industries[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2012, 42: 1-14.
[11] BOM P R D, LIGTHART J E. Public infrastructure investment output dynamic, and balanced budget fiscal rules[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamic and Control, 2014, 40(3): 334-354.
[12] 安体富，任强.促进产业结构优化升级的税收政策[J].中央财经大学学报，2011（12）：1-6.
AN Tifu, REN Qiang.Tax policies on promotion of industrial structure[J]. Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics, 2011（12）：1-6.
[13] 张同斌，高铁梅.财税政策激励、高新技术产业发展与产业结构调整[J].经济研究，2012（5）：58-70.
ZHANG Tongbing, GAO Tiemei. Finance and taxation policy motivation，high-tech industry development and industrial structure adjustment[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2012（5）：58-70.
[14] 李文.从供给角度分析税收政策与产业结构优化[J].税务研究，2006（1）：40-44.
[15] KITAO S. Short-run fiscal policy: Welfare, redistribution and aggregate effects in the short and long-run [J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2010, 34: 2109-2125.
[16] ASCHAUER D A. Does public capital crowd out private capital[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1989, 24: 171-188.
[17] 王敏，曹润林.市场的决定性作用认识：基于政府投资与积极财政政策经济效应的实证分析[J].宏观经济研究，2014(7)：85-90.
[18] 杨俊，王燕.积极财政政策与私人投资关系的区域差异——基于中国东、中、西部面板数据的检验与分析[J].财经科学，2007(5)：118-124.
YANG Jun, WANG Yan.Regional difference in the relationship between positive fiscal policy and private investment[J]. Finance & Economics, 2007(5)：118-124.
[19] 张莹，刘波.货币政策、财政政策对我国投资行为影响的实证研究[J].金融研究，2009（5）：18-25.
[20] 刘建民，王蓓，吴金光.基于区域效应的财政政策效果研究——以中国的省际面板数据为例：1998-2010[J].经济学动态，2012（9）：30-35.

(下转第540页)

经济新常态下相机抉择的财政政策效果研究——基于市场情绪波动性的视角

The economic effect of discretionary fiscal policy research under the new normal based on the perspective of market sentiment volatility

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价