卫星遥感多通道微波比辐射率植被指数（EDVI）在不同类型植被区的特点分析研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2020.04.016

中国科学技术大学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (4): 528-541.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2020.04.016

卫星遥感多通道微波比辐射率植被指数（EDVI）在不同类型植被区的特点分析研究

胡继恒，李锐，王雨，王怿璞，符玉云

中国科学技术大学地球和空间科学学院，安徽合肥 230026

收稿日期:2019-02-08 修回日期:2019-03-15 接受日期:2019-03-15 出版日期:2020-04-30 发布日期:2019-03-15
通讯作者: 李锐
作者简介:胡继恒，男，1992年生，硕士生.研究方向：星载微波遥感及其应用.E-mail：hjh18305@mail.ustc.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2017YFC1501402），国家自然科学基金（41820104，41675022，41375148），贝尔蒙特论坛（Belmont Forum and JPI-Climate Collaborative Research Action）和国家自然科学基金委员会合作项目（41661144007），江苏省2011气候变化协同创新中心项目资助.

Analysis of the characteristics of satellite-derived multiple channel microwave emissivity difference vegetation index (EDVI) over different vegetation types

HU Jiheng, LI Rui, WANG Yu, WANG Yipu, FU Yuyun

School of Earth and Space Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

Received:2019-02-08 Revised:2019-03-15 Accepted:2019-03-15 Online:2020-04-30 Published:2019-03-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 地表微波比辐射率植被指数（emissivity difference vegetation index, EDVI）可以很好地指示地表植被含水量，并且可以应用于有云情况和浓密植被区域.以往的研究仅限于使用19GHz和37GHz微波信号，仅能反映植被某单层的含水情况，而Aqua卫星的Advanced Microwave Radiometer-Earth Observing System (AMSR-E) 微波辐射计观测可为植被含水量遥感提供更多的通道选择.本研究利用多源卫星遥感产品，包括AMSR-E亮温、Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) 云参数和欧洲中期天气预报中心(ECMWF)的再分析资料等，反演了东亚及东南亚地区 6.925、10.65、18.7、36.5GHz垂直极化微波通道的陆地表微波比辐射率，并以此建立了三组多通道微波比辐射率植被指数EDVI(6v, 37v)、EDVI(10v, 37v)和EDVI(18v, 37v)，研究了该三组EDVI指数在森林和农田两类植被类型区的特点.结果表明，在森林区域，EDVI(6v, 37v)和EDVI(10v, 37v)普遍大于EDVI(18v, 37v)，这很可能是由于前两者对于浓密植被的穿透更深，能反映更多的植被含水量，而EDVI(18v, 37v)的穿透性相对较弱，主要反映冠层顶部、相对浅薄植被层的植被含水量.综合利用这三组EDVI指数之间的差异，在高大浓密植被区域，可以实现对植被含水量在上、中、下三层的垂直分布的估计.对于低矮植被，其垂直结构不丰富，此三者的差异不明显.

关键词: 卫星遥感, 地表微波比辐射率, 比辐射率差分植被指数, 植被含水量, 植被垂直结构

Abstract: The satellite-derived microwave land surface Emissivity Difference Vegetation Index (EDVI) is a good indicator of vegetation water content (VWC). And it can be used under a cloudy sky and over dense vegetation areas where satellite optical vegetation index can be easily saturated. Previous studies on EDVI used the two frequencies of 19 and 37 GHz only. The associated EDVI can only represent VWC in one single layer of the canopy. Measurements from Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-Earth Observing System (AMSR-E) onboard NASA’s Aqua satellite provided multiple choices of satellite remote sensing VWC with EDVI. In this study, multiple source measurements, including microwave brightness temperature from AMSR-E, cloud parameters from Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and reanalysis of atmosphere states from ECMWF were synergized, to retrieve the microwave land surface emissivity at 6.925, 10.65, 18.7 and 36.5 GHz in eastern and southeastern Asia from 2003 to 2010. The retrievals were then used to define multiple channel EDVIs of EDVI(6v, 37v)，EDVI(10v, 37v) and EDVI(18v, 37v) and the characteristics of those EDVIs over forest and cropland areas were studied. The results showed that, EDVI(6v, 37v) and EDVI(10v, 37v) are greater than EDVI(18v, 37v) in forest dominated areas. This is most likely due to the fact that the penetration depth of EDVI(6v, 37v) and EDVI(10v, 37v) are deeper than that of EDVI(18v, 37v), thus indicating relatively more VWC in thicker canopy layer of the forest. The differences among the three EDVIs can be used to represent the vertical distribution of VWC in upper, middle and lower layers of high and dense vegetation. However, for the shallow and sparse vegetation without significant vertical variation of VWC, the differences among the three EDVIs are too small to be used.

Key words: satellite remote sensing, microwave land surface emissivity, emissivity difference vegetation index(EDVI), vegetation water content, vertical structure of vegetation

中图分类号:

P412.27

胡继恒，李锐，王雨，王怿璞，符玉云. 卫星遥感多通道微波比辐射率植被指数（EDVI）在不同类型植被区的特点分析研究[J]. 中国科学技术大学学报, 2020, 50(4): 528-541.

HU Jiheng, LI Rui, WANG Yu, WANG Yipu, FU Yuyun. Analysis of the characteristics of satellite-derived multiple channel microwave emissivity difference vegetation index (EDVI) over different vegetation types[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology of China, 2020, 50(4): 528-541.

参考文献

［1］ BANNARI A, MORIN D, BONN F, et al. A review of vegetation indices［J］. Remote Sensing Reviews, 1995, 13(1/2): 95-120.
［2］ JACKSON T J, CHEN D, COSH M, et al. Vegetation water content mapping using Landsat data derived normalized difference water index for corn and soybeans［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004, 92(4): 475-482.
［3］ TUCKER C J, SELLERS P J. Satellite remote sensing of primary production［J］. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1986, 7(11): 1395-1416.
［4］ STOW D A, HOPE A, MCGUIRE D, et al. Remote sensing of vegetation and land-cover change in Arctic Tundra Ecosystems［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004, 89(3): 281-308.
［5］ TUCKER C J. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1979, 8(2): 127-150.
［6］ TUCKER C J. Remote sensing of leaf water content in the near infrared［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1980, 10(1): 23-32.
［7］ CHEN J M, CIHLAR J. Retrieving leaf area index of boreal conifer forests using Landsat TM images［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1996, 55(2): 153-162.
［8］ SIMS D A, GAMON J A. Estimation of vegetation water content and photosynthetic tissue area from spectral reflectance: A comparison of indices based on liquid water and chlorophyll absorption features［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003, 84(4): 526-537.
［9］ LI R, MIN Q. Dynamic response of microwave land surface properties to precipitation in Amazon rainforest［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2013, 133: 183-192.
［10］ SHI J, JACKSON T, TAO J, et al. Microwave vegetation indices for short vegetation covers from satellite passive microwave sensor AMSR-E［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2008, 112(12): 4285-4300.
［11］ KIRDIASHEV K P, CHUKHLANTSEV A A, SHUTKO A M. Microwave radiation of the Earth’s surface in the presence of vegetation cover［J］. Radiotekhnika i Elektronika, 1979, 24: 256-264.
［12］ JACKSON T J, SCHMUGGE T J, WANG J R. Passive microwave sensing of soil moisture under vegetation canopies［J］. Water Resources Research, 1982, 18(4): 1137-1142.
［13］ WANG J R, MCMURTREY III J E, ENGMAN E T, et al. Radiometric measurements over bare and vegetated fields at 1.4-GHz and 5-GHz frequencies［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1982, 12(4): 295-311.
［14］ MO T, CHOUDHURY B J, SCHMUGGE T J, et al. A model for microwave emission from vegetation-covered fields［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1982, 87(C13): 11229-11237.
［15］ ULABY F T, RAZANI M, DOBSON M C. Effects of vegetation cover on the microwave radiometric sensitivity to soil moisture［J］. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1983 (1): 51-61.
［16］ BURKE H H K, SCHMUGGE T J. Effects of varying soil moisture contents and vegetation canopies on microwave emissions［J］. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1982 (3): 268-274.
［17］ BRUNFELDT D R, ULABY F T. Measured microwave emission and scattering in vegetation canopies［J］. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1984 (6): 520-524.
［18］ PAMPALONI P, PALOSCIA S. Experimental relationships between microwave emission and vegetation features［J］. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1985, 6(2): 315-323.
［19］ PAMPALONI P, PALOSCIA S. Microwave emission and plant water content: A comparison between field measurements and theory［J］. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1986(6): 900-905.
［20］ CHOUDHURY B J, TUCKER C J. Monitoring global vegetation using Nimbus-7 37GHz data: Some empirical relations［J］. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1987, 8(7): 1085-1090.
［21］ CHOUDHURY B J, TUCKER C J, GOLUS R E, et al. Monitoring vegetation using Nimbus-7 scanning multichannel microwave radiometer’s data［J］. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1987, 8(3): 533-538.
［22］ PALOSCIA S, PAMPALONI P. Microwave polarization index for monitoring vegetation growth［J］. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1988, 26(5): 617-621.
［23］ PALOSCIA S, PAMPALONI P. Microwave vegetation indexes for detecting biomass and water conditions of agricultural crops［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1992, 40(1): 15-26.
［24］ MIN Q, LIN B. Remote sensing of evapotranspiration and carbon uptake at Harvard Forest［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2006, 100(3): 379-387.
［25］ MIN Q, LIN B. Determination of spring onset and growing season leaf development using satellite measurements［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2006, 104(1): 96-102.
［26］ MIN Q, LIN B, LI R. Remote sensing vegetation hydrological states using passive microwave measurements［J］. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2010, 3(1): 124-131.
［27］ LI R, MIN Q, LIN B. Estimation of evapotranspiration in a mid-latitude forest using the Microwave Emissivity Difference Vegetation Index (EDVI)［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2009, 113(9): 2011-2018.
［28］ LI R, MIN Q. Dynamic response of microwave land surface properties to precipitation in amazon rainforest［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2013, 133: 183-192.
［29］ LIU G. A fast and accurate model for microwave radiance calculations［J］. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II, 1998, 76(2): 335-343.
［30］ ASHCROFT P, WENTZ F J. AMSR-E/Aqua L2A Global Swath Spatially-Resampled Brightness Temperatures, Version 3[DB/OL]. Boulder, CO, USA: NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center, 2013[2019-01-10]. http://dx.doi.org/10.5067/AMSR-E/AE_L2A.003 .

［31］ KUMMEROW C, FERRARO R, RANDEL D. AMSR-E/Aqua L2B Global Swath Surface Precipitation GSFC Profiling Algorithm, Version 3[DB/OL]. Boulder, CO, USA: NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center, 2015[2019-01-10]. https://doi.org/10.5067/AMSR-E/AE_RAIN.003.

［32］ PLATNICK S, ACKERMAN S A, KING M D, et al. MODIS Atmosphere L2 Cloud Product (06_L2)[DB/OL]. NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System, Goddard Space Flight Center, USA, 2015[2019-01-10]. http://dx.doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD06_L2.006.

［33］ POLI P, HERSBACH H, DEE D P, et al. ERA-20C: An atmospheric reanalysis of the twentieth century［J］. Journal of Climate, 2016, 29(11): 4083-4097.
［34］ JACKSON T J, SCHMUGGE T J. Vegetation effects on the microwave emission of soils［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1991, 36(3): 203-212.
［35］ DIDAN K. MYD13C2 MODIS/Aqua Vegetation Indices Monthly L3 Global 0.05Deg CMG V006[DB/OL]. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, 2015[2019-01-10]. https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD13C2.006.

［36］ FRIEDL M A, SULLA-MENASHE D, TAN B, et al. MODIS collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2010, 114(1): 168-182.
［37］ LAWLOR D W, CORNIC G. Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants［J］. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2002, 25(2): 275-294.
［38］ ULABY F T, MCDONALD K, SARABANDI K, et al. Michigan microwave canopy scattering models (MIMICS)［C］//International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, “Remote Sensing: Moving Toward the 21st Century”. IEEE, 1988: 1009.

［39］ KARAM M A, FUNG A K, LANG R H, et al. A microwave scattering model for layered vegetation［J］. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1992, 30(4): 767-784

［40］ WANG F, SHI J, ZHANG L, et al. Discrete scatter model for microwave radiometer response to wheat field, comparison of theory and data［C］//2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IEEE, 2012: 638-641.

()
()

卫星遥感多通道微波比辐射率植被指数（EDVI）在不同类型植被区的特点分析研究

Analysis of the characteristics of satellite-derived multiple channel microwave emissivity difference vegetation index (EDVI) over different vegetation types

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价