沪港通对中国市场效率的影响

doi:10.52396/JUST-2021-0157

中国科学技术大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (9): 699-716.DOI: 10.52396/JUST-2021-0157

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

沪港通对中国市场效率的影响

王雨辰¹, 蔡经纬^2*

1.中国科学技术大学管理学院国际金融研究院,安徽合肥 230601;
2.中国科学技术大学管理学院,安徽合肥 230026

收稿日期:2021-07-01 修回日期:2021-09-01 出版日期:2021-09-30 发布日期:2022-01-11
通讯作者: *E-mail:jwcai@mail.ustc.edu.cn

The effect of the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect program on market efficiency in China

WANG Yuchen¹, CAI Jingwei^2*

1. International Institute of Finance, School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230601, China;
2. School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

Received:2021-07-01 Revised:2021-09-01 Online:2021-09-30 Published:2022-01-11
Contact: *E-mail: jwcai@mail.ustc.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究了沪港通对中国市场效率的影响.应用双重差分模型,我们发现连通公司在公告后的20 d内价格增加约4%,并且成交量、流动性和波动性显著增加.我们的研究表明投资者对波动风险要求溢价. 此外,在上海市场,香港投资者的参与有助于降低连通股票的波动性,而在香港市场,上海投资者的参与增加了连通股票的波动性.这种跨市场的差异与投资者交易行为在不同市场上的异质性是一致的.这表明两个市场之间存在风险溢出效应. 价格重估和风险溢出表明,沪港通的实施提高了中国市场的效率.

关键词: 沪港通, 股票回报, 股票波动, 投资者异质性

Abstract: We study the effect of the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect program on market efficiency in China. Applying a difference-in-differences model, we find that connected firms experience a higher about 4% price impact and significantly increased turnover, liquidity, and volatility in 20 days following the announcement. Our results support the evidence that investors demand a premium for volatility risk. Furthermore, in the Shanghai market, the participation of Hong Kong investors helps reduce the volatility of connected stocks, while in the Hong Kong market, the participation of Shanghai investors increases the volatility. The finding of this cross-market variation is consistent with the heterogeneity of investors’ trading behavior across different markets and reflects the existence of risk spillovers between those two markets. The price revaluation and risk spillovers illustrate that the implementation of the program has greatly improved the efficiency of the Chinese market.

Key words: Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect, stock return, stock volatility, investor heterogeneity

中图分类号:

F831.5

王雨辰, 蔡经纬. 沪港通对中国市场效率的影响[J]. 中国科学技术大学学报, 2021, 51(9): 699-716.

WANG Yuchen, CAI Jingwei. The effect of the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect program on market efficiency in China[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology of China, 2021, 51(9): 699-716.

参考文献

[1] Fernandes N, Ferreira M A. Does international cross-listing improve the information environment? Journal of Financial Economics, 2008, 88(2): 216-244.
[2] Foerster S R, Karolyi G A. The effects of market segmentation and investor recognition on asset prices: Evidence from foreign stocks listing in the United States. The Journal of Finance, 1999, 54(3): 981-1013.
[3] Bekaert G, Harvey C R. Emerging equity market volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 1997, 43(1): 29-77.
[4] Bae K H, Chan K, Ng A. Investibility and return volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 2004, 71(2): 239-263.
[5] Umutlu M, Akdeniz L, Altay-Salih A. The degree of financial liberalization and aggregated stock-return volatility in emerging markets. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2010, 34(3): 509-521.
[6] Li D, Nguyen Q N, Pham P K, et al. Large foreign ownership and firm-level stock return volatility in emerging markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2011, 46(4): 1127-1155.
[7] Kim E H, Singal V. Stock market openings: Experience of emerging economies. The Journal of Business, 2000, 73(1): 25-66.
[8] Chen Z, Du J, Li D,et al. Does foreign institutional ownership increase return volatility? Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2013, 37(2): 660-669.
[9] Bekaert G, Harvey C R. Foreign speculators and emerging equity markets. The Journal of Finance, 2000, 55(2): 565-613.
[10] Baker H K, Nofsinger J R, Weaver D G. International cross-listing and visibility. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2002, 37(3): 495-521.
[11] Chan M K, Kwok S. Risk-sharing, market imperfections, asset prices: Evidence from China’s stock market liberalization. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2017, 84: 166-187.
[12] Levine R, Zervos S. Capital control liberalization and stock market development. The World Bank, 1999.
[13] Lesmond D A. Liquidity of emerging markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 2005, 77(2): 411-452.
[14] Bekaert G, Harvey C R, Lundblad C. Liquidity and expected returns: Lessons from emerging markets. The Review of Financial Studies, 2007, 20(6): 1783-1831.
[15] Stulz R M. International portfolio flows and security markets. In: International Capital Flows. Chicago: University Chicago Press, 1999: 257-293.
[16] Rhee S G, Wang J. Foreign institutional ownership and stock market liquidity:Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2009, 33(7): 1312-1324.
[17] Shleifer A. Do demand curves for stocks slope down? The Journal of Finance, 1986, 41(3): 579-590.
[18] Beneish M D, Whaley R E. An anatomy of the “S&P Game”: The effects of changing the rules. The Journal of Finance, 1996, 51(5): 1909-1930.
[19] Lynch A W, Mendenhall R R. New evidence on stock price effects associated with changes in the S&P 500 index. The Journal of Business, 1997, 70(3): 351-383.
[20] Wurgler J, Zhuravskaya E. Does arbitrage flatten demand curves for stocks? The Journal of Business, 2002, 75(4): 583-608.
[21] Chen H, Noronha G, Singal V. The price response to S&P 500 index additions and deletions: Evidence of asymmetry and a new explanation. The Journal of Finance, 2004, 59(4): 1901-1930.
[22] Merton R C. A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. Journal of Finance, 1987, 42(3): 483-510.
[23] Harris L, Gurel E. Price and volume effects associated with changes in the S&P500 list: New evidence for the existence of price pressures. The Journal of Finance, 1986, 41(4): 815-829.
[24] Amihud Y. Illiquidity and stock returns: Cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 2002, 5(1): 31-56.
[25] Vayanos D. Flight to quality, flight to liquidity, and the pricing of risk. Cambridge, MA: Sloan School of Management, MIT, 2004.

沪港通对中国市场效率的影响

The effect of the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect program on market efficiency in China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价