中国科学技术大学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 119-124.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2019.02.006

• 原创论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

短期电力负荷预测模型的比较研究

严慧峰   

  1. 1.国网湖南省电力有限公司,湖南长沙 410004; 2.北京邮电大学模式识别与智能系统实验室,北京 100876; 3.北京中电普华信息技术有限公司,北京 100085
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-15 修回日期:2018-09-18 出版日期:2019-02-28 发布日期:2019-02-28
  • 通讯作者: 谢垚
  • 作者简介:严慧峰,男,1967年生,高级经济师. 研究方向: 智能电网. E-mail: yanhf@hn.sgcc.com.cn

Comparative study of short-term electrical load forecast models

YAN Huifeng   

  1. 1. State Grid Hunan Electric Power Company Limited, Changsha 410004, China; 2. Pattern Recognition and Intelligent Systems Lab., Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, Chian; 3. Beijing China-Power information technology Co. Ltd,Beijing 100085, China
  • Received:2018-06-15 Revised:2018-09-18 Online:2019-02-28 Published:2019-02-28

摘要: 为了解决提高电力负荷预测精确度这一问题,越来越多的人工智能方法应用于能量功率预测.为此利用湖南省2014年至2017年的电力负荷数据,比较自回归(AR)模型、BP神经网络(BPNN)和指数平滑(ES)模型在预测日度电力负荷和月度电力负荷上的性能,并运用统计学知识来分析三种模型之间的差异.最终根据实验结果得出两个结论:AR模型对日度数据预测的结果优于其他两个模型以及ES模型对月度数据预测的结果优于其他两个模型.

关键词: 短时电力负荷预测, 自回归模型, BP神经网络, 指数平滑模型

Abstract: In order to solve the problems of electrical load prediction performance improvement, more efforts are being made to apply artificial intelligence methods in electrical load prediction. Using the electricity load data of Hunan Province from 2014 to 2017, the autoregressive (AR) model, BP neural network (BPNN), and exponential smoothing (ES) model were compared in terms of their performance of predicting both daily and monthly electrical load, respectively, and analyze the differences among the aforementioned three models. According to the experimental results, it was that the autoregressive model performs better in daily predictions than the other two models, while the exponential smoothness model gives better monthly predictions.

Key words: short-term electricity load prediction, autoregressive model, bp neural network, exponential smoothing model