中国科学技术大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 228-245.DOI: 10.52396/JUST-2021-0056

• 研究论文:管理科学与工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

消费者异质性视角下损失规避分销渠道中的质量与库存决策

张锦曦1, 何浩楠2*, 王善勇3, 孙启鹏2, 马飞2, 马天山2   

  1. 1.长安大学运输工程学院,陕西西安 710064;
    2.长安大学经济与管理学院,陕西西安 710064;
    3.中国科学技术大学公共事务学院,安徽合肥 230026
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-25 修回日期:2021-03-22 出版日期:2021-03-31 发布日期:2021-11-16
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail:haonanhe@chd.edu.cn

Quality and inventory decisions in loss-averse distribution channels considering consumer heterogeneity

Zhang Jinxi1, He Haonan2*, Wang Shanyong3, Sun Qipeng2, Ma Fei2, Ma Tianshan2   

  1. 1. College of Transportation Engineering, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China;
    2. School of Economics and Management, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China;
    3. School of Public Affairs, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
  • Received:2021-02-25 Revised:2021-03-22 Online:2021-03-31 Published:2021-11-16
  • Contact: *E-mail: haonanhe@chd.edu.cn

摘要: 考虑二维的消费者异质性,对企业的质量和库存决策进行了研究.具体的,消费者异质性在水平方向上体现为对产品的估值差异,而在垂直方向体现为对参考价格的设定差异.通过建立一个三阶段的斯坦伯格主从博弈模型(Stackelberg leader-follower model),给出了两种分销渠道中各方成本最优的市场决策.与传统文献的结论相反,我们的模型结果说明当市场不确定性增加时,最优库存和质量决策可能反而会更高.这是因为不确定性对总需求的影响在两个维度上是截然相反的.具体而言,纵向不确定性(参考效应差异)对市场总需求有抑制作用,并将被损失规避行为进一步放大;横向不确定性(消费者估值的异质性)对市场需求有促进作用,导致企业提高库存量.此外,数值结果进一步表明,市场总需求可能不会继承个体的行为偏差,导致市场需求对损益的敏感度与消费者的损失规避行为之间存在不一致的关系.我们的研究结果不仅有助于理解由具有行为偏差的消费者组成的市场需求的随机特征,而且有助于重新审视渠道成员的最优库存和质量决策.

关键词: 累积市场需求, 损失规避市场, 产品质量与库存, 报童模型, 分销渠道

Abstract: In this paper, we examine firms’ quality and inventory decisions with consumers who behave heterogeneously not only on the product’s valuation (horizontal) but also on the reference price setting (vertical). Through a three-stage Stackelberg leader-follower model, we derive cost-effective solutions for channel members in two distribution scenarios. Counter-intuitively, the analytical result illustrates that profit-maximizing inventory and quality decisions can be higher when the uncertainty of the market increases because the two-dimensional impacts of market uncertainty on demand are diametrically opposite to each other. Specifically, the vertical uncertainty (difference in reference effects) has a buffering effect on the aggregate market demand, which is further amplified by loss-aversion behaviors. However, the horizontal uncertainty (heterogeneity of consumer valuation) has a promoting effect on the market demand and induces firms to order more. The numerical result further shows that market demand may not inherit the behavioral bias of individual consumers, leading to an inconsistent relationship between the sensitivity of market demand to gain/loss and consumers’ loss-aversion behaviors. Our findings have implications not only for understanding the stochastic market demand with behaviorally biased consumers but also for determining the channel members’ optimal inventory and quality decisions.

Key words: aggregate market demand, loss-averse market, product quality and inventory, newsvendor model, distribution channel

中图分类号: