[1] Others D B. BP statistical review of world energy. BP Statistical Review, London, UK, accessed, 2018, 6: 2018. [2] Rezvani Z, Jansson J, Bodin J. Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2015, 34: 122-136. [3] Ensslen A, Gnann T, Jochem P, et al. Can product service systems support electric vehicle adoption? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2020,137: 343-359. [4] 陈开朗. 新能源汽车行业中政府、企业和消费者三方的博弈分析. 经济研究导刊, 2015(12): 72-75. Chen K. Analysis of government, enterprise and consumer games in the new energy vehicle industry. Economic Research Guide, 2015(12): 72-75. [5] Liao F, Molin E, Timmermans H, et al. Consumer preferences for business models in electric vehicle adoption. Transport Policy, 2019, 73: 12-24. [6] Elma O. A dynamic charging strategy with hybrid fast charging station for electric vehicles. Energy, 2020, 202: 117680. [7] Fan J, He H, Wu Y. Personal carbon trading and subsidies for hybrid electric vehicles. Economic Modelling, 2016, 59: 164-173. [8] He H, Fan J, Li Y, et al. When to switch to a hybrid electric vehicle: A replacement optimisation decision. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 148: 295-303. [9] Fawcett T, Parag Y. An introduction to personal carbon trading.Climate Policy, 2010, 10(4): 329-338. [10] He H, Wang S. Cost-benefit associations in consumer inventory problem with uncertain benefit. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2019, 51: 271-284. [11] Fawcett T. Personal carbon trading: A policy ahead of its time? Energy Policy, 2010, 38(11): 6868-6876. [12] Li J, Wang S, Fan J, et al. An equilibrium model of consumer energy choice using a personal carbon trading scheme based on allowance price. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 204: 1087-1096. [13] Cao K, Xu X, Wu Q, et al. Optimal production and carbon emission reduction level under cap-and-trade and low carbon subsidy policies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 167: 505-513. [14] Pang Q, Li M, Yang T, et al. Supply chain coordination with carbon trading price and consumers' environmental awareness dependent demand. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018(6): 1-11. [15] BECK M J, ROSE J M, HENSHER D A. Environmental attitudes and emissions charging: An example of policy implications for vehicle choice. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2013, 50: 171-182. [16] Bristow A L, Wardman M, Zanni A M, et al. Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(9): 1824-1837. [17] Raux C, Croissant Y, Pons D. Would personal carbon trading reduce travel emissions more effectively than a carbon tax? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2015, 35: 72-83. [18] Li W, Long R, Chen H, et al. Would personal carbon trading enhance individual adopting intention of battery electric vehicles more effectively than a carbon tax? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2019, 149: 638-645. [19] Li W, Long R, Chen H, et al. Effects of personal carbon trading on the decision to adopt battery electric vehicles: Analysis based on a choice experiment in Jiangsu, China. Applied Energy, 2018, 209: 478-488. [20] Bows A, Anderson K, Upham P. Contraction & Convergence: UK Carbon Emissions and the Implications for UK Air Traffic. Manchester: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, 2006. [21] Fawcett T. Carbon rationing and personal energy use. Energy & Environment, 2004, 15(6): 1067-1083. [22] Starkey R, Anderson K. Domestic Tradable Quotas: A Policy Instrument for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Energy use. Norwich, UK: Tyndall centre for climate change research, 2005. [23] Roberts S, Thumim J. A rough guide to individual carbon trading-the ideas, the issues and the next steps. Report to Defra, Simon Roberts and Joshua Thumim Centre for Sustainable Energy, 2006. [24] Niemeier D, Gould G, Karner A, et al. Rethinking downstream regulation: California's opportunity to engage households in reducing greenhouse gases. Energy Policy, 2008, 36(9): 3436-3447. [25] Wadud Z. Personal tradable carbon permits for road transport: Why, why not and who wins? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2011, 45(10): 1052-1065. [26] Fan J, Wang S, Wu Y, et al. Buffer effect and price effect of a personal carbon trading scheme. Energy, 2015, 82: 601-610. [27] Nelson T, Kelley S, Orton F. A literature review of economic studies on carbon pricing and Australian wholesale electricity markets. Energy Policy, 2012, 49: 217-224. [28] Mcnamara D, Caulfield B. Examining the impact of carbon price changes under a personalised carbon trading scheme for transport. Transport Policy, 2013, 30: 238-253. [29]Li J, Wang S, Fan J, et al. Impact of personal carbon trading schemes on consumer energy consumption. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2016, 36(1): 77-85. [30]Zhao L, Wu S. Research on the theory framework and effects of carbon emission reduction of carbon household registration:Based on the comparative analysis of private cars control. China Economic Studies, 2017(2): 107-117. [31]Zhao L, Wu S. Approach to carbon-exhaust emission reduction through a comparative analysis based on the carbon trading and taxation from the private vehicles owners. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2017,17(2): 688-693. [32] Li L, Wang Z, Wang Q. Do policy mix characteristics matter for electric vehicle adoption? A survey-based exploration. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2020, 87: 102488. [33] Jeon C, Yoo J, Choi M K. The effect of social influence on consumers' hybrid electric vehicles adoption in Korea and China. 14th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology. PyeongChang, South Korea: IEEE, 2012: 336-340. [34] Zhang X, Bai X. Incentive policies from 2006 to 2016 and new energy vehicle adoption in 2010-2020 in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 70: 24-43. [35]Yun J. New energy vehicles. Traffic & Transportation, 2008, 24(2): 28-30. [36] He H, Wang C, Wang S, et al. Does environmental concern promote EV sales? Duopoly pricing analysis considering consumer heterogeneity. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2021, 91: 102695. [37]Ma J, Wang N, Kong D. Market Forecasting modeling study for new energy vehicle based on AHP and logit regression. Journal of Tongji University, 2009, 37(8): 1079-1084. [38]Wang Y, Wang Q. Factor saffecting Beijing residents' buying behavior of new energy vehicle: An integration of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2013,21(S2): 691-698. [39] Han L, Wang S, Zhao D, et al. The intention to adopt electric vehicles: Driven by functional and non-functional values. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2017, 103: 185-197. [40] Jang D C, Kim B, Lee S Y. A two-sided market platform analysis for the electric vehicle adoption: Firm strategies and policy design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2018, 62: 646-658. [41] Zhang Z, Sun X, Ding N, et al. Life cycle environmental assessment of charging infrastructure for electric vehicles in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 227: 932-941. [42] Kong D, Bi X. Impact of social network and business model on innovation diffusion of electric vehicles in China. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, Article ID: 230765. [43] Plötz P, Gnann T, Wietschel M. Modelling market diffusion of electric vehicles with real world driving data—Part I: Model structure and validation. Ecological Economics, 2014, 107: 411-421. [44] Schwoon M. A tool to optimize the initial distribution of hydrogen filling stations. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2007, 12(2): 70-82. [45] Xiang S, Ma T. Integration of ABM and GIS and its application in analysis of diffusion of alternative energy vehicles. Journal of Management Science of China, 2014, 17(1). [46]Wang Z, Li Y, Wang W. Evolving Model of information towards emergencies based on stochastic Petri net. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020,28(3): 113-121. [47] Wang S, Fan J, Zhao D, et al. Predicting consumers' intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model. Transportation, 2016, 43(1): 123-143. |